The Neutrality of Life

Some philosophers think that life is worth living not merely because of the goods and bads within it, but also itself good. I explain how this idea can be formalized by associating each version view with a function from length to value generated itself. Then argue every good faces some following dilemma: either (1) human lives are worse than very long wholly devoid pleasure, desire-satisfaction, knowledge, or any other goods, (2) short containing nothing suffering living. Since neither result plausible, we ought reject On favour, given might it contains, neutral.